LectureLoading…

False imprisonment and malicious prosecution

LUG-101 Law of Torts including Motor Vehicle Accident and Consumer Protection Act, Unit III: False imprisonment and malicious prosecution. · LLB · 60 min

Two torts that protect personal liberty and reputation against abuse of power. The lecture defines false imprisonment and works through its essentials (total restraint, absence of lawful justification, the irrelevance of the plaintiff's knowledge, means of escape and conditions of exit) with Bird v. Jones, Meering v. Grahame-White Aviation, Robinson v. Balmain New Ferry and Herd v. Weardale Steel; the Indian constitutional remedy for illegal detention (Rudul Sah, Bhim Singh, Nilabati Behera, D.K. Basu); the defences; and BNS ss. 126-127. It then defines malicious prosecution and explains the five things a plaintiff must prove, with Mohammad Amin v. Jogendra Kumar Bannerjee on what is a "prosecution", Hicks v. Faulkner on reasonable and probable cause and Glinski v. McIver, and ends with a comparison table. It answers 2019-20 Q B4, 2022-23 Q2(a), 2023-24 Q4(b) and 2025-26 Q3(a)(ii).

Objectives

Slides

  1. False imprisonment: meaning
  2. The essentials of false imprisonment
  3. Total restraint: Bird v. Jones (1845)
  4. Knowledge not necessary: Meering v. Grahame-White Aviation (1919)
  5. Means of escape and conditions of exit
  6. India: illegal detention as a constitutional tort
  7. Defences to false imprisonment
  8. Malicious prosecution: definition and essentials
  9. Reasonable and probable cause
  10. Malice, damage and civil proceedings
  11. False imprisonment and malicious prosecution compared

Loading the lecture…