LectureLoading…

Capacity to contract (ss. 11, 12, 68): minors, persons of unsound mind and persons disqualified by law

LUG-103 Law of Contract including Specific Relief Act & Sale of Goods Act, Unit I: Capacity to enter into a contract: · LLB · 60 min

This lecture covers topics 17 and 18 of Unit I. It starts from s. 11 and the three classes of incompetent persons, then takes the minor's agreement in full: Mohori Bibee and 'void ab initio', no ratification, no estoppel against a minor (Khan Gul; Ajudhia Prasad), restitution and compensation (s. 65 does not apply; s. 33 of the Specific Relief Act 1963 and the 2017-18 problem on the fraudulent mortgage), necessaries under s. 68 (Nash v. Inman), contracts beneficial to a minor (Raj Rani v. Prem Adib; Sri Kakulam Subrahmanyam), the minor as agent, partner and shareholder, and the English position (Leslie v. Sheill). It ends with persons of unsound mind under s. 12 and persons disqualified by law.

Objectives

Slides

  1. Section 11: who is competent to contract
  2. Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose: the minor's agreement is void ab initio
  3. No ratification; minor as promisee; the rule is a shield
  4. No estoppel against a minor: Khan Gul v. Lakha Singh and Ajudhia Prasad v. Chandan Lal
  5. Restitution and compensation: s. 65 does not apply; s. 33 of the Specific Relief Act 1963; Leslie v. Sheill
  6. Problem: the minor's fraudulent mortgage for Rs 10,000 (2017-18 Q(C)1)
  7. Necessaries: s. 68 and Nash v. Inman
  8. Contracts beneficial to a minor; the minor as agent, partner and shareholder
  9. Persons of unsound mind: s. 12
  10. Persons disqualified by law (2022-23 Q2(f))
  11. How the examiner asks it

Loading the lecture…