Elements of crime: actus reus and mens rea; mens rea in statutory offences and its exceptions
LUG-106 Substantial Law of Crimes-I (The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - I), Unit I: Elements of crime: actus reus and mens rea. · LLB · 60 min
The maxim actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea and the four elements of a crime: a person, a guilty mind, a prohibited act or illegal omission, and injury. How the Sanhita builds mens rea into each offence through words such as intentionally, knowingly, voluntarily, dishonestly, fraudulently and rashly (s. 2), how omissions are made acts (ss. 2(25), 3(4), 3(7)), and when a statute dispenses with mens rea altogether: Sherras v. De Rutzen, Ravule Hariprasada Rao, Mayer Hans George and Nathulal. Asked in 2024-25 Q1(a) and 2025-26 Q1(b) and (c).
Objectives
- Explain the maxim actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea and its place in the Sanhita
- Identify the four elements of a crime with the section of the BNS that supplies each
- Explain actus reus, including illegal omission (ss. 2(15), 2(25), 3(4)) and causation
- Explain the mens rea words of s. 2 BNS and the degrees of mens rea
- Apply the presumption of mens rea to a statutory offence and state its exceptions with cases
Slides
- The maxim and the four elements
- Element one: a person, including a company (s. 2(26))
- Element three: actus reus, act and illegal omission
- Actus reus continued: causation
- Element two: mens rea, the words the Sanhita uses
- The degrees of mens rea and why they matter
- Element four: injury (s. 2(14)), and the crimes that need none
- Mens rea in statutory offences: the English starting point
- The Indian rule: Hariprasada Rao and Nathulal
- The exception in action: State of Maharashtra v. Mayer Hans George (1965)
- The exceptions to mens rea, collected
- How the examiner asks it
Loading the lecture…